« Lloyd Pye | Home | Gary Larson busts our whole species »
Excerpt from: The Starchild Skull, Lloyd Pye
By Ed Itor | January 1, 2007
Excerpt from
The Starchild Skull
Genetic Enigma Or. . . Human-Alien Hybrid
By Lloyd Pye
©Bell Lap Books, 2007
At the same time I studied the finer points of deformity, I also brushed up on hybridization, which I had to learn quite a bit about in the writing of my book, Everything You Know Is Wrong. In Part IV, I deal with the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, a Sumerologist and ancient history theorist who is well-known and widely respected in the world of alternative knowledge. His books deal mostly with the writings left to posterity by the ancient Sumerians. His work is truly groundbreaking, and therefore is highly controversial because human hybridization at the hands of alien “gods” is at its core.
The Sumerians left to posterity as many as 100,000 tablets written on soft clay in a language known as cuneiform. After completion, those tablets would be fired in a kiln and turned to stone, thus becoming the benchmark for veracity in ancient times-”written in stone.” Most of those tablets detail everyday workings of Sumerian society and culture, which, inexplicably, sprang out of nowhere about 5,000 years ago to achieve an extremely high level of sophistication overnight in historical terms. In practical terms, it seems impossible.
The Sumerians produced over 100 of the “firsts” we now attribute to a high civilization, though writing is the only one they are consistently given credit for. They were, by all accounts, a civilization so “sudden” that they impress even the most hidebound establishment scholars. However, what makes the Sumerians so special in history, and in the writings of Sitchin, myself, and others, is the written record they left regarding what the establishment calls their “mythology,” but what alternative scholars call their “history.”
Part of their history, according to alternative scholars, was somehow knowing that Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto were in our solar system, 4,000 years before we rediscovered that lost knowledge. They didn’t label Earth as the “third rock from the Sun,” as we do; they regarded it as number seven because they started with Pluto and counted inward. (And isn’t that an unusual perspective for a people supposedly not long out of caves and just past hardscrabble subsistence farming?) They also included a currently “missing” planet in their scheme of things, a very unusual one they called “Nibiru,” on which lived their “gods,” the Anunnaki.
According to the Sumerians, the Anunnaki could travel to and from Nibiru in spacecraft, and 600 of them started settling on Earth around 400,000 years ago. By around 300,000 years ago, the transplants decided to create for themselves (in their “house of fashioning”) new plants and animals to “give the gods their ease” (make life on the distant outpost more comfortable and, presumably, more like home). They also decided to create a “slave and servant” to further make their life on the outpost as comfortable as it could be.
From this came our modern domesticated plants and animals, among which were the “Adamu,” the first humans. (The term “Adamu,” the slaves and servants created by the Anunnaki “gods” of the Sumerians, was slightly modified 2000 years later to become “Adam” in the Old Testament.) The Anunnaki created the Adamu by hybridizing their own “essence” with the essence of “creatures of Earth,” the planet’s indigenous upright walking beings. We assume those were either Homo Erectus or Neanderthals, both of whom were in existence when the Adamu were being created.
The “creatures of Earth” provided an appropriate physical model for a functional slave and servant formed “in our own image, after our own likeness” (another set of words on a Sumerian tablet copied 2,000 years later in Genesis). The new Adamu would be smart, but not too smart; strong, but not too strong-i.e., useful but not inherently dangerous.
In this hybridization between the Anunnaki (the “gods” who lived on Nibiru) and the “creatures of Earth,” I heard echoes of what I thought I might be seeing in the Starchild.
Most people have the idea that hybridization is a 50-50 division, half from the parent of one species and half from the other. It never works like that. Even in normal conceptions, one parent will inevitably dominate how you look (your “phenotypic expression”). So the spread can be 60-40 or 70-30 or even 80-20. However, in the case of human beings, if the Sumerians were correct about us being genetically engineered in the Anunnaki “house of fashioning,” then the split in our phenotypic expression could be 90-10 or even 95-5.
There can be little doubt that, apart from our bipedality, humans have virtually nothing in common with Homo Erectus or Neanderthals. Then, in a widely reported study in 1987, our mitochondrial DNA revealed that our genetic history as a unique species, as the beings we are today, extended back to only about 200,000 years, precisely when the Sumerian tablets indicated that the Adamu were created!
Humans, it turns out, have 46 chromosomes, while all other higher primates have 48. How could two entire chromosomes go missing from our gene pool, yet we are so much more mentally sophisticated, so much “better,” than higher primates? To me, something was absurdly dissonant about that fact, and in my studies I found out what geneticists know but seldom advertise, so no one of any importance will notice: Those two chromosomes aren’t missing!
By a seeming “miracle” of genetic good fortune, somehow humanity’s second chromosome is actually a fusion of the second and third chromosomes of higher primates! So we keep all of the higher primate gene code in those two chromosomes, but we have it massively rearranged from what Mother Nature could rationally be expected to produce by an accumulation of miniscule mutations.
Depiction of first five chromosomes in humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. Note second and third human chromsomes are fused into one. (An adaptation based on research published in “The Origin Of Man: A Chromosomal Pictorial Legacy,” a 1982 article in Science, Vol 215, Issue 4539, 1525-1530 by J. J. Yunis and O. Prakash.)
The fusion of our second and third chromosomes simply could not occur by mutations alone-it required something very much like intervention, by brains and hands capable of manipulating it in . . . well, a “house of fashioning” sounds as if it could have been much like a genetics lab, doesn’t it?
There are many other valid evidences to support what is becoming known as the “Intervention Theory” of human origins. But what it meant to the Starchild case was that it had given me a firm grasp on how a hybrid being might be created between a human and a Grey alien. On the surface, they would not seem able to procreate, almost certainly not by a normal sexual union. However, if the union could be genetically engineered, then virtually anything became possible.
You would have to start with the egg of a human female, because even with the Anunnaki, it began with female eggs. Why? Because the size of eggs relative to sperm make them easier to work with in a genetics laboratory. You have to utilize both to make a hybrid, but the sperm contains only its package of chromosomes and genes, while eggs contain all of that plus all of the mechanisms needed to carry a fetus through its gestation to birth. So, if you intend to hybridize between a human and a Grey alien, you should start with a human mother. Once that condition is met, you can skew the balance of traits as much as your genetic expertise permits.
This is how you get human beings looking absolutely unlike any other higher primate on the planet. We seem to have indeed been made “in the image and after the likeness” of the “gods” who created us, gods not fully adapted to our planet or its gravity. This is why in many ways we are physically maladapted to our terrestrial home, as evidenced by our sunlight sensitive eyes and skin, bad lower backs, varicose veins, hemorrhoids, and similar gravity-induced debilitations.
The point is that the Starchild could indeed have been a hybrid between a human mother (herself from a hybrid species created 200,000 years ago) and a Grey alien father, and it could be a perfectly viable offspring while being 90 or 95 percent like its father and only slightly like its mother. This was the only way I could explain the stunning lack of human corollaries for the features in the Starchild skull. Virtually everything about it was unlike any human counterpart, yet it had lived and functioned at least until the age of five.
Without my previous understanding of hybrids, and how they could be genetically created by those who knew what they were doing, I could never have pressed the Starchild’s case with the confidence I was beginning to feel about it.
************
Once I had convinced myself I wasn’t on the government’s hit list, I went to Wal-Mart and bought a durable, lockable tool box to hold both skulls in a foam bed cut to accept them. Then, at a dumpster at my apartment comlex, I held a brief ceremony of respect for duty well served by the El Paso cardboard box. I never knew how many years it held its prizes.
That serious-looking tool box (gray, of course, in honor of its contents) added a decided uptick to my credibility as I continued taking the skulls to scientists or doctors who agreed to examine them. In addition, I took them to psychics and other “sensitives” who wanted to “psychometrize” them. I wasn’t picky and I didn’t play favorites. I wanted and needed solid, verifiable, provable information, and I didn’t care where it came from as long as I felt I could count on it. Thus, the bottom line gradually, surprisingly revealed itself.
Scientific “experts” knew no more about what they told me than psychics. And while we’re at it, toss in UFOlogists. Between those widely disparate groups, I couldn’t see any difference in insight or understanding. Whatever their outward intentions, all three groups did little more than guess, just tossing mental darts at the problem, hoping to hit somewhere near it. The most consistent thing was that everyone I talked to-scientist, psychic, or UFO buff-sounded convinced they were correct. What none of them realized was that now I knew enough to know they were guessing.
All they did was leave me wondering what to try next.
Topics: Quotes and Good Articles |
Comments are closed.