By David Pursglove | May 18, 2007
Dan Drasin, a contributor here, forwarded this to me several days ago. It’s a perfect introduction to this topic. I’ve been familiar for several years with Dean Radin’s “presentiment” experiments and Bierman’s replications in Amsterdam. And always saying WOW!! about them.
Who are we if so many of us can do this with such ease? And if this, then what about that pesky “arrow of time” that only aims one way? And. . .once more (I’ve asked this question elsewhere on the blog). . .what about the savant syndrome people? Who are we or who might we all become as a species that can do what these special persons among us can do?
SCIENTISTS EXPLORE HUMAN ABILITY TO "SEE" INTO THE FUTURE
This Is London, Monday, May 7, 2007
Do some of us avoid tragedy by foreseeing it? Some scientists now believe that the brain really CAN predict events before they happen Professor Dick Bierman sits hunched over his computer in a darkened room.
The gentle whirring of machinery can be heard faintly in the background. He smiles and presses a grubby-looking red button. In the next room, a patient slips slowly inside a hospital brain scanner. If it wasn’t for the strange smiles and grimaces that flicker across the woman’s face, you could be forgiven for thinking this was just a normal health check.
But this scanner is engaged in one of the most profound paranormal experiments of all time, one that may well prove whether or not it is possible to predict the future. For the results — released exclusively to the Daily Mail — suggest that ordinary people really do have a sixth sense that can help them ‘see’ the future.
Such amazing studies — if verified — might help explain the predictive powers of mediums and a range of other psychic phenomena such Extra Sensory Perception, deja vu and clairvoyance. On a more mundane level, it may account for ‘gut feelings’ and instinct.
The man behind the experiments is certainly convinced. "We’re satisfied that people can sense the future before it happens," says Professor Bierman, a psychologist at the University of Amsterdam. "We’d now like to move on and see what kind of person is particularly good at it."
And Bierman is not alone: his findings mirror the data gathered by other scientists and paranormal researchers both here and abroad. Professor Brian Josephson, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist from CambridgeUniversity, says: "So far, the evidence seems compelling. What seems to be happening is that information is coming from the future.
"In fact, it’s not clear in physics why you can’t see the future. In physics, you certainly cannot completely rule out this effect."
Virtually all the great scientific formulae that explain how the world works allow information to flow backwards and forwards through time — they can work either way, regardless.
Shortly after 9/11, strange stories began circulating about the lucky few who had escaped the outrage. It transpired that many of the survivors had changed their plans at the last minute after vague feelings of unease. It was a subtle, gnawing feeling that ‘something’ was not right. Nobody vocalised it but shortly before the attacks, people started altering their plans out of an unspoken instinct.
One woman suffered crippling stomach pain while queuing for one of the ill-fated planes which flew into the WorldTradeCenter. She made her way to the lavatory only to recover spontaneously. She missed her flight but survived the day. Amid the collective outpouring of grief and horror it was easy to overlook such stories or write them off as coincidences.
But in fact, these kind of stories point to an interesting and deeper truth for those willing to look. If, for example, fewer people decided to fly on aircraft that subsequently crashed, then that would suggest a subconscious ability to divine the future. Well, strange as it seems, that’s just what happens. The aircraft which flew into the TwinTowers on 9/11 were unusually empty.
All the hijacked planes were carrying only half the usual number of passengers. Perhaps one unusually empty plane could be explained away, but all four? And it wasn’t just on 9/11 that people subconsciously seemed to avoid disaster.
The scientist Ed Cox found that trains ‘destined’ to crash carried far fewer people than they did normally. Dr Jessica Utts, a statistician at the University of California, found exactly the same bizarre effect. If it was possible to divine the future, you might expect those at the sharp end, such as pilots, to have the most finely tuned instincts of all. And again, that’s just what you see.
When the Air France Concorde crashed in 2000, it wasn’t long before the colleagues of those killed in the crash spoke about a sense of foreboding that had gripped the crew and flight engineers before the accident. Speaking anonymously to the French newspaper Le Parisien, one spoke of a "morbid expectation of an accident."
"I had this sense that we were going to bump into the scenery," he said. "The atmosphere on the Concorde team for the last few months, if one has the guts to admit it, had been one of morbid expectation of an accident. It was as if I was waiting for something to happen." All of these stories suggest that we can pick up premonitions of events that are yet to be.
Although these premonitions are not in glorious Technicolor, they are often emotionally powerful enough for us to act upon them. In technical parlance it is known as ‘presentiment’ because emotional feelings are being received from the future, not hard facts or information.
The military has long been fascinated by such phenomena. For many years the U.S. military (and latterly the CIA) funded a secretive programme known as STARGATE, which set out to investigate premonitions and the ability of mediums to predict the future.
Dr Dean Radin worked on the STARGATE programme and became fascinated by the ability of ‘lucky’ soldiers to forecast the future. These are the ones who survived battles against seemingly impossible odds. Radin became convinced that thoughts and feelings — and occasionally-actual glimpses of the future — could flow backwards in time to guide soldiers.
It helped them make life-saving decisions, often on the basis of a hunch. He devised an experiment to test these ideas. He hooked up volunteers to a modified lie detector, which measured an electrical current across the surface of the skin.
This current changes when a person reacts to an event such as seeing an extremely violent picture or video. It’s the electrical equivalent of a wince. Radin showed sexually explicit, violent or soothing images to volunteers in a random sequence determined by computer.
And he soon discovered that people began reacting to the pictures before they saw them. It was unmistakable. They began to ‘wince’ a few seconds before they actually saw the image. And it happened time and time again, way beyond what chance alone would allow. So impressive were Radin’s results that Dr Kary Mullis, a Nobel Prizewinning chemist, took an interest. He was hooked up to Radin’s machine and shown the emotionally charged images.
"It’s spooky," he says "I could see about three seconds into the future. You shouldn’t be able to do that."
Other researchers from around the world, from EdinburghUniversity to Cornell in the U.S., rushed to duplicate Radin’s experiment and improve on it. And they got similar results. It was soon discovered that gamblers began reacting subconsciously shortly before they won or lost. The same effect was seen in those terrified of animals, moments before they were shown the creatures. The odds against all of these trials being wrong are literally millions to one against.
Professor Dick Bierman decided to take this work even further. He is a psychologist who has become convinced that time as we understand it is an illusion. He could see no reason why people could not see into the future just as easily as we dip into memories of our past. He’s in good company.
Einstein described the distinction between the past, present and future as "a stubbornly persistent illusion." To prove Einstein’s point, Bierman looked inside the brains of volunteers using a hospital MRI scanner while he repeated Dr Radin’s experiments. These scanners show which parts of the brain are active when we do certain tasks or experience specific emotions.
Although extremely complex, and with each analysis taking weeks of computing time, he has run the experiments twice involving more than 20 volunteers. And the results suggest quite clearly that seemingly ordinary people are capable of sensing the future on a fairly consistent basis. Bierman emphasises that people are receiving feelings from the future rather than specific "visions."
It’s clear, though, that if ordinary people can receive feelings from the future then perhaps the especially gifted may receive visions of things yet to be. It’s also clear that many paranormal phenomena such as ESP and clairvoyance could have their roots in presentiment.
After all, if you can see a few seconds into the future, why not a few days or even years? And surely if you could look through time, why not across great distances?It’s a concept that ties the mind in knots, unless you’re a physicist.
"I believe that we can ‘sense’ the future," says the Nobel Prizewinning physicist Brian Josephson.
"We just haven’t yet established the mechanism allowing it to happen. People have had so called ‘paranormal’ or ‘transcendental’ experiences along these lines. Bierman’s work is another piece of the jigsaw. The fact that we don’t understand something does not mean that it doesn’t happen."
If we are all regularly sensing the future or occasionally receiving glimpses of it, as some mediums claim to do, then doesn’t that mean we can change the future and render the ‘prediction’ obsolete? Or perhaps we were meant to receive the premonition and act upon it?
Such paradoxes could go on for ever, providing a rich seam of material for films such as "Minority Report" — based on a short story of the same name — in which a special police department is able to foresee and prevent crimes before they have even taken place.
Could such science fiction have a grain of truth in it after all? The emerging view, Bierman explains, is that "the future has implications for the past."
"This phenomena allows you to make a decision on the basis of what will happen in the future. Does that restrain our free will? That’s up to the philosophers. I’m far too shallow a person to worry about that."
The problem with presentiment is that it appears so nebulous that you can’t rely on it to make reliable decisions. That may be the case, but there are plenty of instances where people wished they had listened to their premonitions or feelings of presentiment.
One of the saddest involves the Aberfan disaster. This occurred in 1966 when a coal tip collapsed and swept through a Welsh school killing 144 people, including 116 children. It turned out that 24 people had received premonitions of the tragedy.
One involved a little girl who was killed. She told her mother shortly before she was taken to school: "I dreamed I went to school and there was no school there. Something black had come down all over it." So should we listen to our instincts, hunches and dreams? Some experts believe we may already be using them in our everyday lives to a surprising degree.
Dr Jessica Utts at the University of California, who has worked for the U.S. military and CIA as an independent auditor of its paranormal research, believes we are constantly sampling the future and using the knowledge to help us make better decisions.
"I think we’re doing it all the time," she says. "We’ve looked at the data and it does seem to happen."
So perhaps the Queen in Through The Looking Glass was right: "It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards."
See: BRAIN-MIND RESEARCH
See: EXTRAORDINARY HUMAN CAPABILITIES
© 2007 This is London
By David Pursglove | May 17, 2007
Terence McKenna* on high doses of psilocybin mushrooms often encountered what he called “machine elves”. These guys were from elsewhere/when. He found their contributions beneficial to his mind**. Possibly a good sign for our inquiry here. Others have reported similar positive results with various psychoactives of contacts with “teachers”, some of whom seemed “unearthly” both in the sense of from the “other side” and/or non-human. (See Graham Hancock’s latest, Supernatural Meetings with Ancient Teachers of Mankind.)
I have a hunch narratives linking psychedelic experience to UFO contact are hard to find in the literature, not because they are infrequent, but because experiencers are reluctant to report in print two bizarre episodes rolled into one. The psychedelicos and the Ufolks have enough to defend on their own turfs without giving both debunkers and drug warriors double grounds for ridicule. (Such concerns didn’t slow McKenna down, of course. Not even for a beat.)
“True Hallucinations” or not, this is murky ground, and any illuminating comments or posts could be a big help. For instance, are there any reports of contacts with allegedly off-planet beings among the psychoactive-using shamans? If yes, could these experiences be emulated? Graham Hancock offers positive reports. Others?
*His books include True Hallucinations; The Archaic Revival; Trialogues at the Edge of the West: Chaos, Creativity and the Resacralization of the World (with Ralph Abraham and Rupert Sheldrake) including a to-die-for intro essay by Jean Houston!
**from a ’93 interview with “UFO” magazine’s editor, Vicki Cooper (quoted in Zen in the Art of Close Encounters: Crazy wisdom and UFOs, p.180):
[McKenna]: Well, so what that means is that a hallucination is datum for reality in the same way that ordinary perception is. Shamans have been talking to aliens for a hundred thousand years. For some reason, it is ruled not [in the same category] as what we’re talking about – we the flying saucer people. It’s a puzzling thing to me, because the experience is repeatable. The one thing which science always says of the flying saucers is, “Well, you can’t produce them on demand.” But with DMT [Dimethyltryptamine, a powerful, fast-acting psychedelic] you can produce encounters with elves on demand.
Vocabulary note: Psychoactives are the compounds typically in the mind-expanding/enabling category. Psychotropics are the psychiatric meds that typically function in the opposite way.
By David Pursglove | May 17, 2007
Yep, I’ve already got it that we are “paranormal” children. But I’m thinking of the recent wave of research and opinion – and a helping of hype as well – around such as the “indigo” and “crystal”children among others. If this is any sort of innovation in our species and not just an artifact of the innate, unusual talents of most children* now being noticed by adults. . .at last. . .it may deserve our attention here.
*See The Magical Child (1977) by Joseph Chilton Pearce
By David Pursglove | May 17, 2007
Granted, a subject rather tangential to the blog’s purpose. . .Or is it? My bet is most contributors here are nominal post-Darwinists and subscribe to at least an ostensibly “scientific” version of Intelligent Design (Behe, Paul Davies and others) that bears only coincidental relation to a few Creationist stances. (Maybe I shouldn’t have capitalized the “I” and the “D” lest the initial caps convey an unwelcome aura of authoritarian Xianity.)
But the ID subject’s a perennial hot button in the USA, and I’m sure it’ll come up here, and generate fruitful discussion of new angles on the subject and more. Here’s the place for up-and-back on those ideas.
By David Pursglove | May 17, 2007
I’ve had several ideas over the past few months of how an individual or group might get in the right kind of touch with friendly EBEs (recall the very broad definition of an EBE from the top of the “About this Blog” page). I’d like to trot some of them out here, but I want to encourage anyone else with similar hits to start the ball rolling. This topic is one of the geographic centers of this blog, so I hope we’ll have many posts and comments.
By Ed Itor | January 18, 2007
Dan Drasin is an award-winning documentary filmmaker, media producer, amateur geek and dilettante philosopher. He eats kneejerk skeptics for breakfast, and is the author of the widely reprinted and web- linked antiskeptic essay "Zen and the Art of Debunkery." He is currently co- producing a series of television documentaries about scientific research into the afterlife. His favorite books of all time are Richard Bach’s "Ilusions" and Stefan Denaerde’s "UFO Contact from Planet Iarga." His favorite food is not available on this planet
Topics: Contributors' Biographical Info | Comments Off
By Ed Itor | January 1, 2007
WALKING THROUGH A WALL
Unlike flying or astral projection, walking through walls is a totally earth-related craft, but a lot more interesting than pot making or driftwood lamps. I got started at a picnic up in Bowstring in the northern part of the state. A fellow walked through a brick wall right there in the park. I said "Say, I want to try that." Stone walls are best, then brick and wood. Wooden walls with fiberglass insulation and steel doors aren’t so good. They won’t hurt you. If your wall walking is done properly, both you and the wall are left intact. It is just that they aren’t pleasant somehow. The worst things are wire fences, maybe it’s the molecular structure of the alloy or just the amount of give in the fence, I don’t know, but I’ve torn my jacket and lost my hat in a lot of fences. The best approach to a wall is, first, two hands placed flat against the surface; it’s a matter of concentration and just the right pressure. You will feel the dry, cool inner wall with your fingers, then there is a moment of total darkness before you step through on the other side.
By Ed Itor | January 1, 2007
Silbury Hill and glyph, Wiltshire, near Stonehenge, England
Topics: Quotes and Good Articles | Comments Off
By Ed Itor | January 1, 2007
Can we retrain ourselves at this late date to become Finders of hidden treasure? And by what technique, seeing that it is precisely technique which has betrayed us? Derangement of the senses, insurrection, piety, poetry? Knowing how is a cheap mountebank’s trick. But knowing what might be like divine self-knowledge – it might create ex nihilo.
By Ed Itor | January 1, 2007
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There is an opinion, common among scientists and intellectuals, that our earthly existence is not only rather ordinary, but is, in fact, insignificant and purposeless. But perhaps this melancholy assumption despite its heroic pretense, is mistaken. Perhaps the unprecedented scientific knowledge acquired in the last century, enabled by equally unprecedented technological achievements, should, when properly interpreted, contribute to a deeper appreciation of our place in the cosmos. (from a review of the DVD "The Privileged Planet" in Atlantis Rising, May/June, 2007, p.54)